Lettera Aperta Alla Nuova Presidente Del Consiglio Italiano Giorgia Meloni In Materia Di Ambiente Ed Energia

I publish a generic response letter to those who write to me to receive articles to publish, conferences to participate in, as I cannot satisfy their requests without being inconsistent with myself. As a man free from partisan interests, a designer and inventor, I have always tried to understand and propose the best industrial and environmental solutions, trying to overcome the current scientific and technological state of the art. Unfortunately, the current world production and energy system has not only produced global warming and an unequal distribution of world wealth, it has reached a dead end, as it is much simpler and cheaper to extract clean energy directly from the environment than try to clean up fossil energy which still accounts for 80% of the world's energy. 

I publish a generic response letter to those who write to me to receive articles to publish, conferences to participate in, as I cannot satisfy their requests without being inconsistent with myself. As a man free from partisan interests, a designer and inventor, I have always tried to understand and propose the best industrial and environmental solutions, trying to overcome the current scientific and technological state of the art. Unfortunately, the current world production and energy system has not only produced global warming and an unequal distribution of world wealth, it has reached a dead end, as it is much simpler and cheaper to extract clean energy directly from the environment than try to clean up fossil energy which still accounts for 80% of the world's energy.    

It took a lifetime of work in industry and the environment as well as unpaid work as a retiree to develop all the details that led me to this unfortunate conclusion for the current world power centers. But at the same time, I invite you to look at the reverse of the coin, because we can start reversing the heating cycle with an equally powerful planet cooling system, which in addition to being economically advantageous is also environmentally purifying. Obviously, we will not be able to completely eliminate fossil energy, but we will be able to limit it only to strictly indispensable cases such as the production of cast iron, steel, incinerators, but realizing complete purification cycles, by means of the modification of the chimneys and the introduction of calcareous greenhouses with artificial rains, which would completely close the combustion fume cycles, producing carbonates and mineral salts in the fume cooling water. All the other world energy needs of fixed and mobile plants can be produced cold without producing heat, CO2 and steam, therefore there will be no need for cooling and purification plants as atmospheric air and gravity will be the energy source primary and water the energy vector, as described in detail in the individual inventions. Since it seems that my solutions have dissatisfied all public and private employers, and since none of my forty inventions has ever been tested and implemented, I believe it is useless to answer the publishers and organizers of the congresses. I consider my work as a designer and inventor concluded with the latest inventions, where I demonstrated that we can cold produce all the electrical and electromagnetic energy we need without fuels and nuclear energy. Current inventions have opened cycles that have not been able to close in fixed industrial and environmental anthropic plants. How could they close these loops in mobile plants? Today, man-made plants, fixed and mobile that do not close the cycles they open, are produced in billions of specimens with the consent of all world governments and the United Nations. 

Unfortunately, all this has already happened and we suffer the consequences, spending more resources to repair the damage caused by climate change than to create real well-being. Which well-being becomes increasingly distant and unattainable if human beings do not learn to cold-extract primary energy from the earth's environment as the undersigned did without public and private capitalist and communist contributions. The whole world is a country in this respect. I don't expect any reward for my work. I have noticed it every day from the great silences that I collect. However, I could not escape my duty to investigate in a multidisciplinary way, even if my job as an employee was only to use existing technologies. Not to overcome them. To overcome the state of the art, I had to leave the world of work because entrepreneurs participating in public tenders cannot spit on the plate they eat from and neither can their employees. My investigations into the cleanup of fossil energy led me to discover a Pandora's box with immense unsolved problems which, in my opinion, could have been solved many years earlier by simply using the interactive principles between water and air not only for purification purposes, but also to produce the earth's universal primary energy, an alternative in an advantageous way for the environment and the earth's economy. However, even today, with over forty patent filings filed, of which only seventeen granted, and more than a hundred publications, collected on my website https://www.spawhe.eu, still persist silences and leaks of responsibility from part of public bodies, multinationals and legislators. I think that experimentation cannot be denied, of the solutions proposed by inventors not linked to public and private power centers, while the glaciers are melting, the waters of the seas are softening and the levels are rising; droughts and floods alternate without respecting the calendars of the traditional four seasons. All environmental and energy inventions should be tested in the open with public money and evaluated by popular juries based on the results of the trials, because science, made up of public and private employees, is no longer reliable if it continues to remain silent and begins to experiment with interactive solutions without fuels and nuclear energy. What are the world's governments and public bodies that are supposed to protect the earth's environment doing if we are inundated with commercial inventions that instead of reducing global warming, increase it? As long as world legislators allow the current trade of patents from public research institutions to multinationals, there will never be free and impartial science and technology. For the current world centers of power, keeping science and technology specializations separate is essential in order not to advance the scientific and technological state of the art globally. In fact, multinationals are specialized in single technological activities, as well as the world's university faculties. This explains the reason why in two hundred years of industrial development no one has ever thought of modifying the chimneys to capture the fumes and extract the CO2 with inorganic chemistry, producing carbonates in the water by means of artificial rains on calcareous material to create cycles more complete purification between water and polluted air, before the fumes are transformed into vapor and the combustion gases, including CO2, are released into the atmosphere. Clearly, this process is energetically expensive because raising the water requires a lot of electricity, which produced with the same fossil energy, would require accurate cost-effectiveness calculations of the purification process. However, purification cannot be renounced for reasons of economic convenience. But who said that to clean up CO2 pollution we have to produce more CO2? Why has no world scientist or inventor ever thought of placing a pump and a turbine in series in an open basin to realize that the current generator coupled to the turbine produces much more electrical energy than the one absorbed by the motor coupled to the pump? So we could clean fossil energy without producing CO2, but with hydroelectricity without the hydraulic jump. Why has nobody financed the hydroelectric plants in open basins without the hydraulic jump, filed as patents in 2014? The world's ruling class has continued to finance thermal plants without worrying about neutralizing CO2 and other combustion gases. All thermal plants, apart from CO2, produce evaporations and therefore contribute to global warming. Water vapor is the main greenhouse gas that affects global warming twice as much as CO2. Unfortunately, water vapor has not been accused by terrestrial science as the main cause of global warming because it is not toxic and does not produce acidity in water as CO2 does by producing carbonic acid (h2 CO3). While some public researchers have also blamed steam, no one has gone into detail about producing power without heat and the resulting production of flue gases, CO2 and steam. Why are these scientists also silent about my solutions that would at least virtually solve environmental problems? Until proven otherwise, the economic calculations of the purification solutions of the environment are not up to science, if the purifications are essential to protect the environment and prevent disasters such as storms and water bombs. In fact, the entire world science, public and private, has not considered that in the atmosphere, the presence of excess steam, due to large thermal plants (steel mills, incinerators, thermal and nuclear power plants, thermal engines of all sizes, plants of heating) represents a potential fluid dynamic energy, which can rapidly be transformed into a powerful kinetic energy, due to the different density of the particles of air, steam and water involved. If we consider that steam is 60 times denser than air and when transformed into water it acquires a density 830 times higher than air, since the fluid-dynamic kinetic energy is given by the product of the flow rate by the speed and by the density of the average mass moves in the atmosphere, it is evident that the presence of high percentages of vapor produce strong accelerations of atmospheric precipitations, which have nothing to do with the natural terrestrial evaporations which had found their natural balance in 4.5 billion years, before of the energy choices made in the design of terrestrial, fixed and mobile anthropic plants. If we consider that the percentage of CO2 in the atmosphere at the beginning of the industrial era was 278 ppm and today is 420 ppm, it means that in less than 15.

 Before proposing myself as an inventor, I lived on the front line as a designer and installer of man-made systems in the automotive industry, which is the most up-to-date and multidisciplinary industry in the world. From this type of industry I learned to coherently put together the various technologies to increase the speed of production processes. The same thing can also be done in other anthropic plants in the world, the speed of the plants is fundamental: water and air purification, alternative energy production, water distribution, water lifting, etc. It was no coincidence that after seventeen years of work in the automotive industry, I also did the same job in the world's public purification, energy and water plants, not to change them but to get to know them for another twenty years. I only made my concrete and multidisciplinary proposals as a pensioner because I already knew that no one would listen to me. In the world of work, no one can spit on the plate from which he eats, both as an entrepreneur and as an employee. For this reason it should be public science that is more innovative, but it is not, precisely because it is not multidisciplinary and does not know the scientific organization of work, which can only be learned in private industry to beat the competition on a commercial level. Furthermore, the trade in patents, allowed by world legislators and by the United Nations, has aggravated the situation because nobody develops multidisciplinary projects. Public researchers, like multinationals, paid by governments, with taxpayers' money, work almost exclusively to sell patents to multinationals in specific sectors. It should be clear that by working this way, everyone is working to defend the investments already made. If these investments have produced global warming, why can't anyone correct them? I, who as I wrote above, learned to work in the automotive industry, when I changed jobs and dealt with environmental systems, I could not help but realize that the heat engines of the automotive industry must be replaced with compressed hydroelectric engines, not only from an environmental point of view, but also from an economic point of view. If the objective of studying the scientific organization of work is to increase the speed of processes and reduce production costs, because this type of organization is only used to produce commercial inventions and not to increase the speed of environmental protection ? Why haven't public designers and inventors, who are supposed to protect the environment, improved the technologies they are responsible for? For the undersigned it is clear that they have not studied the scientific organization of environmental and energy work in depth because indirectly, through the patent trade, one-way towards multinationals, they too work for multinationals. So there are huge conflicts of interest between public and private science, allowed by governments. Therefore, on planet earth we have an excellent speed of industrial production and a low speed of purification processes. I, who first studied the organization of industrial work and then changed jobs to also learn about the scientific organization of environmental work, realized that it is not enough to simply increase the speed of the purification processes as it would aggravate too much the already high energy costs. It is necessary to change the entire world energy system, not with palliatives such as battery-powered cars, solar panels, wind energy. It is necessary to change the primary energy source of world energy which must be produced cold, at the temperature of the earth's environment if it would take a great global scientific revolution. Where could this revolution come from? The absolute majority of the world's population struggles for daily survival. The few who might believe it cannot afford to gamble their jobs to go against those who hold global economic power. Political, religious, philosophical, cultural powers are not real powers. These are the details never developed by world public and private science on the organization of environmental and energy work that do not allow us to extract energy from the environment, which instead with hindsight we should have started extracting from the beginning of the eighteenth century , when the first hydroelectric plant with hydraulic jump was born. Immediately afterwards, science had to understand that by putting in series a pump that works in the direction of the gravitational force and a turbine in systems that are always full of water, therefore without dispersing the water, we were able to produce electricity indefinitely because the energy absorbed from the engine that makes it turn is always much lower than the energy produced by the current generator coupled to the turbine, due to the simple fact that the engine only has to overcome the state of inertia while the generator produces the electric current in proportion to the hydrostatic head present on the the turbine shaft. The whole of world science has not done this simple reasoning that the undersigned did over two hundred years after which led to the conception of compressed hydroelectric and compressed hydroelectromagnetic energy which can also be achieved in mobile plants, including space ones, by adding together the thrust by Newton and Lorentz. I think these silences of the entire world science are shameful. Who can say that they have done the same in the last two hundred years? Above all, without public money and those of multinationals? For practical purposes, what are more useful for human survival, the theories of relativity, quantum, or the daily updating of the scientific organization of earthly work in all sectors of human activity? If we think that not even Albert Einstein noticed that the ideal terrestrial energy is different from the universal one, which clearly is thermal and nuclear, it should have been clear that before inventing steam boilers, heat engines, the atomic bomb , we should have better studied the functioning of the terrestrial environment and made terrestrial inventions, better studying the energy sources and energy vectors to be used. It was necessary to analyze the scientific organization of the earth's natural work, which is certainly not thermodynamic or even nuclear, since all chemical and biological processes take place at the temperature and pressure of the earth's environment. These processes are simply fluid dynamics. We only have to manage the air pressure, which is the energy source and is also the most powerful and cheapest energy accumulator.